Technical SEO Architecture October 08, 2026 Read time: 6 min

Rel=Prev & Rel=Next: The Real Story

SEO Checks
SEO Checks Intelligence
Digital Growth Systems
#Pagination SEO #Technical SEO #Crawl Optimization
Rel=Prev & Rel=Next: The Real Story

What are rel=prev and rel=next used for?

Core Takeaway

Rel=prev/next originally signaled paginated sequences to search engines, but their role has changed dramatically.

Rel=prev and rel=next are HTML link attributes that were once used to indicate a sequential relationship between paginated pages, such as page 1, page 2, and page 3 of a category or article series. They told search engines: “This page is part of a sequence—here is the previous and next piece.”

Their original purpose was to consolidate ranking signals across a paginated series and help search engines understand the order of content. For example, on an e-commerce category with multiple pages of products, you would add <link rel="prev" href="/category?page=1"> and <link rel="next" href="/category?page=3"> in the <head> section.

  • Signal sequence: Indicate a logical reading order.
  • Consolidate signals: Prevent duplicate content issues across pages.
  • Improve discovery: Help crawlers find all pages in a series.

Are rel=prev and rel=next still supported by Google?

Core Takeaway

Google no longer uses rel=prev/next for ranking, but they may still aid accessibility and other search engines.

No, Google officially deprecated rel=prev and rel=next as indexing and ranking signals in March 2019. Google’s John Mueller confirmed that these attributes are no longer used for ranking purposes, and they are treated as ordinary HTML hints that are largely ignored.

Google now relies on crawlable links and page content to understand pagination. If your pages are linked together with standard anchor tags, Google can follow the sequence naturally. However, this does not mean rel=prev/next are harmful—they simply don't provide the SEO benefit they once did.

  • Bing and other engines: Some still recognize them as hints, but support varies.
  • Accessibility: They can help screen readers and other assistive technologies understand page order.
  • No penalty: Keeping them won't hurt, but removing them won't improve rankings.

What should I use instead of rel=prev and rel=next for pagination?

Core Takeaway

Replace rel=prev/next with crawlable links, self-referencing canonicals, and unique content to optimize pagination.

Modern pagination SEO focuses on crawlable links, unique content, and proper canonicalization. Here’s what to implement instead:

  • Standard anchor links: Ensure each paginated page links to the next and previous pages using normal <a> tags. Google follows these.
  • Self-referencing canonicals: Each paginated page should have a canonical tag pointing to itself, not to page 1. This prevents deindexing of deeper pages.
  • Unique content and titles: Add unique product descriptions, meta titles, and H1s for each page to avoid thin content.
  • URL parameters: Use clean, readable URLs like /category?page=2 or /category/page/2 instead of session IDs.
  • Load more or infinite scroll: If using JavaScript, ensure content is accessible via separate URLs for crawling.

For a deeper technical audit, use our Technical SEO Check tool to identify pagination issues automatically.

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to structural technical gaps

Do I need to remove rel=prev and rel=next from my site?

No, you don't need to remove them. They are harmless and may still help with accessibility and other search engines. Focus your efforts on crawlable links and unique content instead.

Can rel=prev and rel=next cause duplicate content issues?

No, they were designed to help prevent duplicate content by indicating a sequence. But since Google ignores them, you should use self-referencing canonical tags to manage duplication.

What is the best way to handle pagination for SEO in 2025?

Use crawlable anchor links, self-referencing canonicals, unique titles and descriptions, and ensure your paginated content is valuable. Avoid noindexing deeper pages unless they are truly thin.

Does Bing still support rel=prev and rel=next?

Bing has stated they treat them as hints, not directives. They may help with discovery, but they are not guaranteed to influence rankings. Always prioritize standard links.

Execute This Strategy Instantly

Run a free technical SEO check to automatically detect pagination errors, canonical issues, and crawl bottlenecks on your site immediately.

Launch Free Tool